Understanding Mandatory Elements in Reformed Assessment Plans

Since the reformed apprenticeship assessment plans started appearing, I've noticed confusion about two particular terms during various industry meetings: mandatory knowledge and skills, and mandatory assessment methods. These appear prominently in every reformed assessment plan, but what they actually mean in practice isn't immediately obvious.

The confusion is understandable. When you open an assessment plan and see knowledge and skills statements printed in bold alongside a requirement for a specific assessment method, it's natural to assume they're connected. They're not, at least not in the way most people think.

What Mandatory Knowledge and Skills Actually Mean

Let's start with the bold statements scattered throughout the assessment outcomes section. Take the AI and Automation Practitioner standard we've just launched. Open that assessment plan and you'll see statements like K10 (AI ethics and responsible innovation), K18 (governance frameworks), S10 (configuring AI and automation solutions), and S15 (delivering continuous improvement) printed in bold whilst others remain in regular text.

Here's what that bold formatting signals: these particular knowledge and skills statements must be assessed in every version of the assessment that an assessment organisation makes available. That's the extent of it.

It doesn't mean all mandatory knowledge and skills have to be covered in a single assessment method. It doesn't mean they have to be in the mandatory assessment method. It means that across whatever combination of assessment methods an assessment organisation designs, these specific statements must be covered.

The purpose is straightforward. For any given apprenticeship, certain knowledge and skills are absolutely fundamental to occupational competence. By identifying these as mandatory, the assessment plan ensures that every apprentice, regardless of which assessment organisation assesses them or when they're assessed, will have demonstrated these core capabilities. It's about maintaining consistency and confidence in outcomes.

The proportion of mandatory content varies between standards depending on what the occupation requires. Trailblazer groups, working with employers, assessment organisations, and sector bodies, identify the right content during assessment plan development. Some standards might have a higher proportion of mandatory statements, others fewer. What matters is that the mandatory content represents what's genuinely essential.

What about the non-mandatory knowledge and skills? These are still important and must still be assessed, but assessment organisations have more flexibility in how they approach them. Assessment organisations might choose to assess different non-mandatory statements with different apprentices, provided all assessment outcomes are met and occupational competence can be reliably demonstrated. The key principle remains that apprentices must demonstrate competence across the full breadth of the occupational standard.

What Mandatory Assessment Methods Actually Mean

Now let's address the other source of confusion: mandatory assessment methods.

Every reformed assessment plan specifies one assessment method that must be used. For AI and Automation Practitioner, that's a Project. For Data Technician, it's a Simulated Task. This doesn't mean it's the only assessment method that can be used. It means it's the one method that must appear in every assessment organisation's approach.

Assessment organisations then select additional methods from a provided list to ensure all assessment outcomes are covered. For AI and Automation Practitioner, that list includes Presentation, Simulated task, Professional discussion, and Portfolio. An assessment organisation might choose one of these, or several, depending on what they determine is the most valid and reliable way to assess the remaining content.

The mandatory method serves a specific purpose: it gives all users of the apprenticeship confidence that there's one common element in the assessment, regardless of where or when it takes place. It's chosen carefully, with input from employers and assessment organisations during the assessment plan's development, to be a method that validly assesses a significant portion of the standard's content. However, it's important to understand that mandatory knowledge and skills don't have to go in the mandatory assessment method. These are two separate requirements that work independently.

What Assessment Organisations Decide

Assessment organisations now make strategic decisions about how to structure assessments within the parameters set by the assessment plan. They decide which optional methods to use, how to distribute content across those methods, and how to sample non-mandatory content. These decisions balance validity, reliability, and proportionality. A method that's excellent for assessing one type of content might be unnecessarily burdensome for another.

Let me use Data Technician as a concrete example, since we've been directly involved in that trailblazer group. The assessment plan requires a Simulated Task as the mandatory method, with options to add a Portfolio, Project, or Professional discussion. The plan also identifies specific mandatory knowledge and skills across all six assessment outcomes.

An assessment organisation designing their approach might put some mandatory statements in the Simulated Task and others in a Professional discussion. Another organisation might cover different mandatory statements in a Portfolio. Both approaches are valid, provided all mandatory content is assessed somewhere and all assessment outcomes are met.

The only requirement is that all mandatory content appears somewhere in the overall assessment design. Assessment organisations have the expertise to make these judgements, and the reformed system gives them the flexibility to do so. They document these decisions in their assessment strategies.

What This Means for Delivery

The mandatory elements in assessment plans aren't there to create rigidity. They're there to ensure consistency in what matters most whilst creating space for assessment organisations to design proportionate, efficient assessments that maintain rigour without unnecessary burden. As these reformed plans roll out across more standards, understanding how mandatory elements work will help everyone navigate the changes more confidently. The system has more flexibility than it might first appear, and that flexibility exists for good reasons.

For training providers, the practical implication is this: you won't know exactly how an assessment organisation will structure their assessments just from reading the assessment plan. The plan sets the boundaries, but the specific design sits with the assessment organisation.

This means conversations with your chosen assessment organisation become even more important. Assessment organisations will provide clear information about which methods they're using, how they've distributed content, and what apprentices need to demonstrate in each assessment. That's the detail you need for effective preparation.

At Accelerate People, we're actively engaging with our providers as we develop our assessment approaches for reformed standards. We value your insight into what works in practice, and your input helps us make informed decisions about assessment methods and structure. If you're delivering any of the reformed standards with us, we'll be reaching out for your perspective as our development progresses.

If you're working with any of the reformed standards and have questions about how mandatory elements work in practice, we're here to help navigate these new requirements.

GET IN TOUCH